Evaluation according to ACVIM
Shih et al. 2010: Petmap vs. invasive
 |
Normotensive: |
Bias SAP - 14,7 mmHg, MAP - 16,4 mmHg, DAP - 14,1 mmHg |
Hypotensive: |
Bias SAP - 32 mmHg, MAP - 24,2 mmGh, DAP - 16,8 mmHg |
Evaluation Doppler and HDO vs. Telemetry in conscious cats (Martel et al, in preparation)
Below table 2.40 Summary of the results within an apparatus across the three technicians
Doppler:  |
Apparatus |
Regression coefficient |
Bias |
Limits of agreement |
Paired measurements (%) within ± 10 mmHg (1) |
Paired measurements (%) within ± 20 mmHg (2) |
Doppler 1 |
0.951501 |
21.9 |
± 23.5 |
15 |
47 |
Doppler 2 |
0.948206 |
16.2 |
± 25 |
27 |
61 |
Doppler 3 |
0.951501 |
18.3 |
± 26 |
25 |
52 |
Systolic arterial blood pressure was measured both by Doppler and Telemetry methods in the conscious cat.
(1) percentage of paired measurements lying within a difference less than 10 mmHg between the two methods.
(2)
percentage of paired measurements lying within a difference less than 20 mmHg between the two methods.
Below table 2.1 Summary table
HDO  |
Animal No. |
Regression coefficient |
Bias |
Limits of agreement |
Paired measurements (%) within ± 10 mmHg (1) |
Paired measurements (%) within ± 10 mmHg (2) |
2008017 |
0.913311 |
-4.3 |
± 23.9 |
97.0 |
97.0 |
2008018 |
0.938719 |
-2.7 |
± 20.7 |
84.0 |
100.0 |
2008019 |
0.845708 |
-5.1 |
± 31.9 |
87.0 |
93.0 |
2008020 |
0.946730 |
-3.2 |
± 17.4 |
91.0 |
100.0 |
2008024 |
0.975803 |
1.6 |
± 13.4 |
91.0 |
97.0 |
2008025 |
0.917352 |
0.7 |
± 22.0 |
78.0 |
91.0 |
Mean |
0.922937 |
-2.2 |
± 21.6 |
88.0 |
96.3 |
SD |
0.017980 |
1.1 |
2.6 |
2.7 |
1.5 |
N |
6.000000 |
6.0 |
6.0 |
6.0 |
6.0 |
- 12 points | HDO benefits| ACVIM consensus | ACVIM tables